Acquiring Ranchos Water Company is right move for Apple Valley (March 8, 2015)
Our community has made it clear: The Town of Apple Valley should control its water future.
Years of out-of-control rate increases and being ignored by out-of-town, private owners have left us with no choice. Deepening the wound, those same out-of-town, private owners have launched a malicious misinformation campaign to try to convince the community that we’re wrong, they’re right and that somehow we should accept business as usual.
So let’s separate fact from the fiction that’s being spread, beginning with an Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company-crafted opinion piece published in last Sunday’s Daily Press. The piece states
your Town Council has spent at least $500,000 to study a takeover of the company. No one seems to know where that number came from — thin air, perhaps — and, in fact, to date we have spent less than half that amount studying this option.
That same piece references a Blue Ribbon Water Committee empanelled in 2011, which recommended against potential acquisition at that time. What it fails to point out is that since 2011, Apple Valley Ranchos’ outside owners have accelerated rate increases, most recently requesting a 31.55 percent rate hike over the next three years.
What you also will not hear from the current owners is that because Apple Valley Ranchos is a private company, its rate increases are not subject to the same public scrutiny of a town-owned water system. Instead, Apple Valley Ranchos’ rates are governed by the California Public Utilities Commission, whose criteria include ensuring a profit for the company.
All of which leads us to where we are today — committed to stabilizing rates and protecting the interests of our residents and businesses. Contrary to what the company is saying, we are well positioned to pay a fair price for Apple Valley Ranchos. Instead, the company’s parent has chosen to try to sell the system and its assets to a foreign-owned, for-profit investment firm.
Not that we’re against companies making money. We pride ourselves as a business-friendly community.
Where we do have an issue is forcing ratepayers to feed a company’s profit motives. Water, we believe, is part of the public domain, which is why most water systems are publicly owned. It’s also why in cities where that is not the case — Claremont and Ojai, for example — residents are rallying behind efforts by their local leaders to take or retake ownership of their water systems.
In the case of Apple Valley, two-thirds of respondents in a recent survey said they supported the Town’s acquiring of Apple Valley Ranchos. We have a history of solid financial planning and fiscal responsibility. As has been demonstrated time and again, the Town knows how to efficiently manage community assets and we have senior managers already on staff with extensive water agency management experience.
In simplest terms, we have the experience and wherewithal to handle such a move. How we get there is largely up to Apple Valley Ranchos. The Town would prefer a friendly sale at a negotiated, fair market purchase of the company and its assets, and, despite the company’s claims, have no immediate plans or desire for eminent domain.
As for another company claim — that acquiring Apple Valley Ranchos would create a bigger taxpayer burden — the reality is the Town is well positioned to avoid that. Though debt service would increase initially, it will be offset by cost reductions resulting from the elimination of the 9 percent profit margin and the latest round of rate increases, but more importantly, all of those aggravating surcharges to your water bill will disappear.
Best of all, because we’re motivated not by profit but by protecting and serving our residents and businesses, we will be able to stabilize rates moving forward.
Acquiring Apple Valley Ranchos is the right move, and the smart move for Apple Valley right now.
That’s not conjecture. That’s a fact.
Frank Robinson is town manager of Apple Valley.
Source: Daily Press
Files related to Claremont
- 20150308 Acquiring AVRWC is right move for Apple Valley
- 20150314 Expense of possible AVRWC acquisition difficult to gauge
- 20150514 Claremont Water System — Supplement to 2012 Appraisal Report
- 20150905 Letter: Lawyers, water, and money (O’Neil)
- 20150918 TOAV fires back at Coupal
- 20150923 Editorial: Water, takeovers, and the people
- 20151015 Cities and private equity firms fight over ownership of water systems
- 20160712 Public records request (Manning)
- 20160721 Conflict of interest (Manning)
- 20160904 Letter: Peter Allen supporting Measure V (Nassif)
- 20161012 Claremont Set To Raise Rates For Utilities
- 20161018 Will Apple Valley become California’s Flint, MI?
- 20161110 Statement of tentative decision (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161110 Judge issues tentative decision against city in water system acquisition trial (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161114 Measures V and W
- 20161115 Polls and votes
- 20161116 Another false narrative
- 20161116 Liberty sees Claremont’s eminent-domain loss as sign of things to come in Apple Valley
- 20161121 Voters show they want a say in water takeover issue (Hanson)
- 20161215 Another costly day for Apple Valley
- 20161218 Time to pay attention: An open letter to Larry Cusack
- 20170111 Claremont city manager getting a $21,000 bonus
- 20170114 Price tag for Claremont’s failed attempt to take over water system keeps rising
- 20170115 Our View: Time for foes to sit down and talk
- Time for the Town Council to listen for a change
- Response to Thomas Lecoq (Carloni)
- Time for a second opinion? (Carloni)
- 20170209 Avoiding the Claremont disaster (video)
- 20170213 Valley Voices: Apple Valley would be wise to work with Liberty Utilities (Wright)
- 20170216 James Belna on the Claremont eminent domain disaster (video)
- 20170220 Claremont resident talks [about] avoiding ‘disaster’ in Apple Valley
- 20170220 Conflict of interest
- 20170220 Letter: Response to Thomas Rice (Belna)
- 20170226 Letter: James Belna’s visit (Hanson)
- 20170226 Letter: Rice rebuttal (Trozpek)
- Claremont public records request
- Truth not tricks (Carloni)
- Comments to the Town Council opposing the ballot measure
- 20170314 Town Council meeting (McCarthy)
- 20170322 Skewing the facts (Hanson)
- 20170323 Letter: Sit down and settle (Henard)
- 20170406 Guest commentary: Government takeovers of water systems don’t deliver results — study
- Who pays?
- Responding to claims made on Facebook
- 20170508 Liberty Utilities radio ad — Claremont (audio)
- Not paying attention
- 20171010 Claremont reaches $4.8 million settlement agreement with Golden State Water
- 20171017 Claremont settlement reignites Apple Valley water war
- 20171026 Claremont cuts ties with its city attorney, law firm