What Are We Doing?

Opposing the hostile takeover of Liberty Apple Valley

  • Commentary
  • Documents
    • Public documents
    • AVRWC documents
    • Cramer Family Park
    • EPCOR acquisition news
    • LAV documents
    • Missoula trial documents
    • TOAV documents
    • TOAV e-mails
    • TOAV invoices
    • Video and audio files
  • The rat-hole
  • Reference
    • About us
    • Links
    • Related items
    • The players
    • Water cost comparisons

Commentary archive

2016

October

  • The company he keeps
  • Trick or treat time (Lee)
  • TOAV can not balance numbers: FACTS (Rice)
  • Scapegoat or conspirator?
  • Water security
  • F.U.D. (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt)
  • Local water
  • Recent water bills (October 11, 2016)
  • The business of water
  • An open letter to Bill McDaniel
  • Hidden future tax ballot measure (Lee)
  • Unprepared: Wet or dry
  • Diving into the shallow waters of Measure W
  • Water bill surcharges

“In addition, there are other factors that show the Town’s Project is not planned in the manner most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. And these factors are, simultaneously, additional evidence disproving that the Town’s Project is required by the public interest and necessity, or that the Town’s Project constitutes a ‘more necessary public use’ of Liberty’s water system.”

— Superior Court Judge Donald Alvarez

Executive summary

My proposal

Maintained by Greg Raven.
Back to Top